QA Panels & Metrics¶
Each processed NEON flight line generates a set of quality assurance (QA) artifacts designed to summarize reflectance distributions, masks, geometry, and harmonization decisions.
This page describes the QA PNG, QA PDF, and QA JSON outputs.
QA PNG¶
The QA PNG provides a quick visual summary of:
- reflectance distributions for key wavelengths
- spatial distribution of masks
- before/after brightness comparison
- BRDF correction diagnostics
- wavelength alignment checks
A typical PNG includes panels for:
- reflectance histograms
- strip-based brightness summaries
- cloud/water/snow/invalid pixel frequencies
- wavelength metadata
- sensor-specific diagnostics
Use this for fast visual inspection.
QA PDF¶
The PDF includes:
- all PNG content
- multi-page extended diagnostics
- tabulated statistics
- optional per-band summaries
- BRDF coefficient tables
- brightness adjustment coefficients
This document serves as a flight-line-level audit record.
QA JSON¶
The JSON file contains machine-readable metrics including:
Reflectance metrics¶
- min/max/median for each band
- proportion of saturated or masked pixels
- brightness differences across correction stages
Mask summary metrics¶
- percent cloud
- percent cloud shadow
- percent snow
- percent water
- percent invalid
BRDF metrics¶
- per-band BRDF coefficients
- reconstruction error statistics
Sensor harmonization metrics¶
- brightness coefficients (per band)
- spectral alignment checks
- per-band RMSE for regression-based harmonization (if applicable)
Geometry metadata¶
- solar zenith/azimuth
- view zenith/azimuth
- DEM statistics
Interpreting QA results¶
Flags to watch for:
- Reflectance values > 1.5 → possible BRDF or DEM issues
- Large brightness shifts → check convolution stage
- High invalid or shadow fraction → consider masking strategy
- Noisy BRDF coefficients → unstable correction in low-SNR regions